Easy2Siksha

GNDU Question Paper-2022

M.A I

Semester

Paper-II: Renaissance Drama

Time Allowed: Three Hours Maximum Marks: 80

Note: Attempt Five questions in all, selecting at least One question from each section. The

Fifth question may be attempted from any section. All questions carry equal marks.

SECTION-A

1.Critically evaluate Aristotle's views on the overall personality and character of Tragic

Hero.

Ans: Aristotle, the famous Greek philosopher, made significant contributions to many fields,

including drama, literature, and art. One of his most influential works is the Poetics, where he

discusses different elements of tragedy and the nature of the tragic hero. In his exploration of

tragedy, Aristotle defines the tragic hero as a central figure whose fate evokes a sense of pity and

fear in the audience. This critical evaluation will simplify Aristotle's views on the personality and

character of the tragic hero, based on his Poetics, in easy-to-understand language.

1. Definition of Tragedy According to Aristotle

Aristotle’s analysis of tragedy begins with his definition of it. He defines tragedy as “an

imitation of an action that is serious, complete, and of a certain magnitude; in language

embellished with each kind of artistic ornament…; with incidents arousing pity and fear,

wherewith to accomplish its catharsis of such emotions.”

In simpler terms, Aristotle views tragedy as a form of drama that depicts serious and

important events in a way that makes the audience feel emotions like pity and fear. This

emotional response is what leads to "catharsis," or a purification of these emotions.

2. The Concept of the Tragic Hero

A central feature of a tragedy is the tragic hero. According to Aristotle, the tragic hero is the

main character of the story who suffers a downfall because of a flaw in their personality or a

mistake in their actions. Aristotle gives several key characteristics that define a tragic hero:

a) Noble Birth or High Status

Aristotle believes that the tragic hero should be someone of noble birth or high status, such

as a king, queen, or someone in a position of power. This is important because the hero's

fall from greatness becomes more dramatic and evokes more emotion. When someone of

Easy2Siksha

high status faces tragedy, the impact is greater than if the tragedy happened to someone of

ordinary status. A king or noble figure losing everything is much more striking and moving.

b) The Hero’s Hamartia (Tragic Flaw)

One of the most important features of a tragic hero is their hamartia, or tragic flaw. This is a

mistake or flaw in the hero's personality that leads to their downfall. Aristotle makes it clear

that the tragic hero is not a perfect person. They possess both good and bad qualities, which

makes them relatable and human. However, it is their tragic flaw that causes them to make

poor decisions and suffer as a result.

For example, in the famous Greek tragedy Oedipus Rex by Sophocles, Oedipus is a great

king, but his tragic flaw is his excessive pride (hubris) and determination to uncover the

truth, even when it leads to his ruin. His pursuit of knowledge and refusal to heed warnings

eventually leads to his downfall.

c) The Hero’s Peripeteia (Reversal of Fortune)

Aristotle believes that the tragic hero's life is marked by a reversal of fortune, which he calls

peripeteia. This is when the hero’s situation changes dramatically, from happiness to misery.

The reversal of fortune is essential in evoking feelings of pity and fear in the audience.

The hero might begin in a position of power, wealth, and happiness, but due to their

hamartia, they experience a sudden and drastic change in fortune. This reversal is usually

brought about by a mistake or action taken by the hero, making the audience feel sympathy

for their situation.

d) The Hero’s Anagnorisis (Recognition)

Another key element in Aristotle’s theory of the tragic hero is anagnorisis, or recognition.

This is the moment when the hero realizes their mistake or tragic flaw. They understand

how their actions have led to their downfall, and this recognition often comes too late to

prevent their tragic fate.

The anagnorisis is a powerful moment because it is when the hero gains insight into their

own life and the consequences of their actions. However, by the time they realize their flaw,

they are already destined to suffer the consequences.

In Oedipus Rex, for example, Oedipus’ anagnorisis occurs when he discovers that he has, in

fact, killed his father and married his mother, fulfilling the prophecy he tried so hard to

avoid. His recognition of the truth comes too late to prevent his downfall, and he is left to

face the tragic consequences.

3. The Emotions of Pity and Fear

For Aristotle, one of the main purposes of tragedy is to evoke feelings of pity and fear in the

audience. The tragic hero's fate should make the audience feel pity for their suffering, but

also fear because the hero’s situation could happen to anyone. These emotions are central

to the experience of watching a tragedy and help lead to catharsis.

Easy2Siksha

• Pity is felt because the hero’s downfall is not entirely deserved. The audience

sympathizes with the hero because, despite their mistakes, they are not evil or

malicious. The tragic hero is often a good person who makes an error in judgment.

• Fear arises because the audience recognizes that the tragic hero’s fate could happen

to anyone. The hero's downfall is often due to a mix of fate, circumstances, and

personal flaws—things that could affect any individual in life. This makes the

audience reflect on their own lives and the potential for suffering and misfortune.

4. Catharsis: The Purpose of Tragedy

The emotional journey that the audience goes through when watching a tragedy is crucial to

Aristotle’s theory. He introduces the concept of catharsis, which refers to the purification or

cleansing of emotions, particularly pity and fear. By experiencing these emotions through

the tragic hero’s story, the audience is able to purge or release their own emotions in a safe

and controlled way.

Catharsis allows the audience to feel emotionally relieved and cleansed after watching a

tragedy. According to Aristotle, this is one of the main reasons people enjoy tragic stories—

it provides an emotional release and a deeper understanding of human suffering and

weakness.

5. The Role of Fate and the Gods

While the tragic hero is responsible for their downfall because of their hamartia, Aristotle

also acknowledges the role of fate and the gods in tragedy. In many ancient Greek tragedies,

the hero’s fate is controlled by divine forces or the will of the gods. The hero’s struggle

against fate or the gods adds another layer to their suffering, as they are often powerless to

change their destiny.

However, it is important to note that Aristotle emphasizes the role of the hero’s own

choices in their downfall. The tragic hero is not merely a victim of fate but also someone

who contributes to their own tragedy through their actions and decisions.

6. The Tragic Hero’s Downfall: Not Entirely Deserved

Aristotle argues that the downfall of the tragic hero should not be entirely deserved. The

hero should not be an entirely evil person or someone who commits wicked deeds. Instead,

they are a good person who makes a mistake or has a flaw that leads to their downfall. This

is what makes the hero’s fate tragic and evokes pity in the audience.

If the hero were completely evil or morally corrupt, their downfall would not evoke pity, and

the audience would feel that they deserved their fate. However, the tragic hero’s downfall is

often seen as disproportionate to their mistake, which makes their suffering seem unfair

and unjust.

7. The Tragic Hero as a Universal Figure

Aristotle’s concept of the tragic hero is universal. While the specific characters in Greek

tragedies may be kings, queens, or other noble figures, the themes of tragedy and the

Easy2Siksha

characteristics of the tragic hero can be applied to many different cultures and time periods.

The idea of a flawed individual facing consequences for their actions is something that

resonates with people across time and place.

The tragic hero embodies the complexities of human nature, including the tendency to

make mistakes and the inevitability of suffering. This is why Aristotle’s views on the tragic

hero remain relevant today, as they reflect fundamental truths about human life and

emotion.

Conclusion

Aristotle’s views on the tragic hero provide a framework for understanding the nature of

tragedy and its impact on the audience. The tragic hero, according to Aristotle, is a person of

high status who suffers a downfall due to a tragic flaw or error in judgment. Their story

evokes pity and fear, leading to a cathartic experience for the audience. Through the tragic

hero’s journey, we gain insight into the complexities of human nature and the consequences

of our actions, making Aristotle’s analysis of the tragic hero both timeless and universally

relevant.

2. What is the importance of Hamartia and Peripeteia in Tragic form of

Drama?

Ans: Importance of Hamartia and Peripeteia in Tragic Drama

In the world of tragic drama, two significant concepts are central to how a tragedy unfolds:

hamartia and peripeteia. These terms originate from the works of the ancient Greek

philosopher Aristotle, who in his seminal work, Poetics, laid the foundations of tragedy as a

literary form. Understanding these two elements helps us grasp why characters in tragedies

suffer and how their journeys take unexpected turns, leading to often heart-wrenching

conclusions. In this discussion, we will explore these terms in-depth, their role in tragic

drama, and how they create the emotional and philosophical impact of a tragedy.

Hamartia: The Tragic Flaw

The term hamartia is often translated as "tragic flaw" or "fatal error." Aristotle first

introduced the concept in Poetics, where he described it as a key element of the tragic

hero’s character. A tragic hero is a character who is fundamentally good, but due to some

weakness or flaw, makes a mistake that leads to their downfall.

Meaning of Hamartia

Hamartia refers to the hero's error or flaw in judgment that ultimately causes their tragic

downfall. It is not necessarily a moral flaw or an inherent character defect. Instead, it can be

Easy2Siksha

an unintentional mistake or misjudgment that triggers a chain of events, resulting in the

hero's ruin.

For example, in Shakespeare's Hamlet, Hamlet’s hamartia is often interpreted as his

indecisiveness. He delays taking action to avenge his father’s death, which causes the

tragedy to spiral out of control. Another famous example is Othello, where Othello’s

hamartia is his jealousy, which drives him to murder his wife, Desdemona, under false

suspicions of infidelity.

Characteristics of Hamartia

1. Unintentional Mistake or Flaw: Hamartia does not always represent a deliberate sin

or wrongdoing. It is more of an error in judgment. The hero may have noble

intentions, but this flaw in judgment causes them to make the wrong decisions.

2. Not Pure Evil: Tragic heroes are not villains. They are individuals of high standing

with good moral character. Their hamartia makes them relatable and human, as it is

through this flaw that the audience can identify with their humanity.

3. Leads to Catastrophe: The hero’s hamartia sets in motion a series of events that

leads to their downfall. Despite their heroic qualities, this flaw results in a tragedy.

4. Complexity in the Character: Hamartia adds complexity to the tragic hero’s

character, making them neither entirely good nor completely evil. The tragic flaw

helps develop a more nuanced and multi-dimensional character, which is why

audiences are drawn to tragic heroes.

Examples in Renaissance Tragedy

In Renaissance drama, particularly in the works of Shakespeare and his contemporaries,

hamartia is a recurring element in tragic plays. Some notable examples include:

• Macbeth (Macbeth by Shakespeare): Macbeth’s hamartia is his ambition. Though

initially loyal to King Duncan, he becomes consumed by his desire for power, leading

him to commit regicide. This act of murder leads to his psychological unraveling and

ultimate destruction.

• King Lear (King Lear by Shakespeare): Lear’s hamartia is his pride and arrogance. He

divides his kingdom based on flattery, ignoring the sincerity of his daughter Cordelia.

This results in chaos and tragedy, culminating in his personal suffering and the death

of his loved ones.

• Doctor Faustus (Doctor Faustus by Christopher Marlowe): Faustus’s hamartia is his

insatiable desire for knowledge and power. He makes a pact with the devil, which

leads to his tragic downfall and eternal damnation.

Peripeteia: The Reversal of Fortune

Peripeteia, another term introduced by Aristotle, refers to the sudden reversal of fortune

experienced by the tragic hero. It is the moment in the plot where the hero’s circumstances

Easy2Siksha

change dramatically, usually from good to bad, or from a hopeful situation to one of

despair.

Meaning of Peripeteia

In tragedy, peripeteia marks the turning point. It is the moment when the hero’s fortunes

reverse, typically due to their hamartia, and this reversal of fortune leads to the climax of

the tragedy. It is a crucial element that amplifies the emotional intensity of the play, as the

audience witnesses the hero’s fall from grace.

For example, in Oedipus Rex by Sophocles, the peripeteia occurs when Oedipus, after

seeking to uncover the truth about his origins, realizes that he has, in fact, fulfilled the

prophecy he was trying to avoid — killing his father and marrying his mother. This

realization shifts the tone of the play from one of investigation to pure tragedy.

Characteristics of Peripeteia

1. Sudden and Unexpected: Peripeteia is often a sudden and unexpected twist in the

plot. It catches both the hero and the audience off guard, dramatically changing the

trajectory of the story.

2. Triggers Catharsis: This reversal of fortune evokes pity and fear in the audience, as

they empathize with the hero’s plight. This emotional response is a key element of

tragic drama and leads to catharsis, the purging of these emotions.

3. Heightens Tension: The peripeteia heightens the tension in the play. After this

turning point, the hero’s fate is sealed, and the audience is left in suspense as the

consequences of the reversal unfold.

4. Inevitable Downfall: Once the peripeteia occurs, the tragic hero’s downfall becomes

inevitable. The rest of the play often deals with the repercussions of this reversal,

leading to the ultimate tragic conclusion.

Examples in Renaissance Tragedy

In Renaissance drama, peripeteia often coincides with the discovery of a truth or the

realization of a mistake. Some notable examples include:

• Hamlet (Hamlet by Shakespeare): The peripeteia in Hamlet comes when Hamlet

accidentally kills Polonius, mistaking him for King Claudius. This act sets off a chain

reaction of events, including Ophelia’s madness and death, Laertes’ desire for

revenge, and ultimately Hamlet’s own demise.

• Othello (Othello by Shakespeare): Othello’s peripeteia occurs when he comes to

believe that his wife Desdemona has been unfaithful with Cassio, thanks to the

manipulations of Iago. This mistaken belief leads to Othello’s tragic decision to kill

Desdemona, sealing his fate.

• Macbeth (Macbeth by Shakespeare): The peripeteia in Macbeth occurs when

Macbeth, despite having successfully seized the throne, begins to realize that his

Easy2Siksha

actions will lead to his downfall. The appearance of Banquo’s ghost and the

prophecy of the witches about Birnam Wood moving towards him mark the turning

point in his fortune.

The Interplay Between Hamartia and Peripeteia

In a well-crafted tragedy, hamartia and peripeteia are intricately linked. The tragic hero’s

hamartia sets off the chain of events that lead to the peripeteia. The reversal of fortune, in

turn, emphasizes the consequences of the hero’s error and magnifies the sense of tragedy.

• Cause and Effect: Hamartia causes the hero to make a critical mistake, which leads

to the peripeteia, or reversal of fortune. The hero’s downfall is the result of their

own actions, which adds a sense of inevitability to the tragedy.

• Emotional Impact: The combination of hamartia and peripeteia intensifies the

emotional experience for the audience. They sympathize with the hero, who is

brought low by a flaw or error that could happen to anyone. The sudden reversal of

fortune brings home the unpredictability of fate, enhancing the dramatic tension.

• Moral Lessons: Tragedies often contain moral or philosophical lessons. Hamartia and

peripeteia work together to show that even good people can fall victim to their own

weaknesses or errors. This highlights the themes of fate, free will, and the

consequences of human imperfection.

Conclusion: The Importance of Hamartia and Peripeteia in Tragic Drama

Hamartia and peripeteia are essential elements in the structure of tragic drama. Hamartia,

the tragic flaw or error in judgment, humanizes the hero and makes their fall relatable.

Peripeteia, the reversal of fortune, creates the dramatic turning point that leads to the

hero’s inevitable downfall.

Together, these two concepts create the emotional depth and philosophical richness of a

tragedy. They evoke pity and fear in the audience, leading to catharsis and a deeper

understanding of the human condition. In Renaissance tragedies, as in ancient Greek drama,

hamartia and peripeteia are used to explore themes of fate, free will, and the complexity of

human nature.

Through the stories of heroes like Oedipus, Hamlet, and Macbeth, audiences are reminded

of the fragility of human existence and the far-reaching consequences of even the smallest

errors in judgment. This is why hamartia and peripeteia remain central to our understanding

of tragic drama, resonating with audiences across time and cultures.

Easy2Siksha

SECTION-B

3. 'Marlowe brilliantly combines the traits of corruption ambition, power and

regretfulness in the figure of Faustus.' Do you agree with this statement ?

Ans: In this question, you're being asked to analyze how Christopher Marlowe, in his play "Doctor

Faustus," creates a character who embodies qualities like corruption, ambition, power, and regret.

The play is about the life of Dr. Faustus, who makes a deal with the devil in exchange for magical

powers and limitless knowledge but ultimately faces the consequences of his actions. The question

asks if you agree that these traits are well-combined in Faustus and wants you to explore how

Marlowe develops this complex character.

Introduction to the Play and the Character of Faustus

"Doctor Faustus" is one of the most famous works of Christopher Marlowe, a leading

playwright of the English Renaissance. The play explores important themes such as

knowledge, ambition, temptation, sin, and redemption. Dr. Faustus, the main character, is a

scholar who feels that the limits of human knowledge are too restricting. He decides to

make a pact with the devil, exchanging his soul for 24 years of magical powers and ultimate

knowledge. Throughout the play, Faustus is torn between his ambition and the moral

consequences of his choices.

Faustus' Ambition

One of the most important traits in Faustus' character is ambition. He is not content with

the knowledge available to humans through science, religion, or philosophy. His desire for

more knowledge and power drives him to extreme actions, such as selling his soul to the

devil.

In the opening scene, Faustus reflects on all the fields of study—medicine, law, theology,

and philosophy—and finds them all lacking. This dissatisfaction shows how his ambition is

boundless. He dreams of having power over the elements, controlling life and death, and

bending nature to his will.

Faustus says:

• "A sound magician is a mighty god."

This statement reflects his desire to transcend human limitations and become like a god,

showing just how ambitious and prideful he is. His ambition becomes the central flaw in his

character, leading him down a path of corruption.

Corruption and the Deal with the Devil

Faustus' ambition leads him to corruption. When he summons Mephistopheles, a demon, to

make a deal with Lucifer (Satan), he willingly gives up his soul. In return, he gets magical

powers for 24 years. This deal marks Faustus’ moral downfall.

At first, Faustus enjoys his new powers. He can summon spirits, travel through time, and

perform tricks that impress people. However, these powers do not fulfill him in the way he

Easy2Siksha

hoped. Instead, Faustus starts to realize that he has corrupted himself by giving away his

soul for limited earthly pleasures.

Throughout the play, there are several moments where Faustus feels remorse for his

actions. He questions whether he has made the right choice and whether it is too late to

turn back. In these moments, Marlowe shows how corruption eats away at Faustus' mind,

making him regretful of his earlier decisions.

Faustus' Desire for Power

Another key trait of Faustus is his desire for power. He craves the ability to control nature

and people around him. The power that Faustus gains from his deal with the devil allows

him to perform miraculous feats, such as summoning Helen of Troy and controlling the

elements. However, these powers are hollow. They bring him temporary satisfaction, but in

the end, he still feels empty.

Faustus' pursuit of power is also ironic. Although he gains supernatural abilities, he is still

ultimately a servant of Lucifer. He believes that he is becoming powerful, but he is actually

becoming more enslaved to evil. Marlowe uses this irony to show how Faustus’ lust for

power is a path to his own destruction.

Regretfulness and the Struggle for Redemption

As the 24 years of his pact draw to a close, Faustus begins to feel deep regret. He realizes

that he has wasted his time on trivial pursuits and that eternal damnation is fast

approaching. He wonders whether he can still be saved, or if it is too late to repent. Faustus’

inner struggle between regret and despair is one of the most human aspects of his

character.

There are several scenes where Faustus contemplates repentance. He is visited by the Good

Angel and Bad Angel, who represent his inner conflict between good and evil. The Good

Angel urges him to repent and ask for God's forgiveness, while the Bad Angel convinces him

that he is already damned and there is no point in seeking redemption.

In the final scene, Faustus is overcome with terror and regret as he realizes that his soul will

soon be claimed by the devil. He desperately calls out for time to stop, for the earth to hide

him, or for God to save him. These final moments show Faustus as a tragic figure, destroyed

by his own ambition and corruption, but still deeply aware of his regret.

Faustus says in his final speech:

• "My God, my God, look not so fierce on me!"

This plea for mercy shows his desperation and regret, but it is too late. His damnation is

sealed, and he is taken away by demons.

Marlowe’s Brilliant Combination of Traits

Marlowe successfully combines these traits—ambition, corruption, power, and

regretfulness—into the character of Faustus to create a complex and tragic figure. Faustus’

Easy2Siksha

ambition leads him to seek knowledge and power beyond human limits, but this same

ambition also brings about his corruption. His desire for power is short-lived, and as he

realizes that his soul is in danger, he becomes filled with regret.

Marlowe uses the character of Faustus to explore deeper philosophical and religious

themes, such as the conflict between human ambition and moral responsibility. Faustus is a

symbol of the Renaissance spirit—a man driven by a thirst for knowledge and power—but

his downfall also serves as a warning against the dangers of overreaching ambition.

In the end, Faustus' regret is a key part of his tragedy. He is not simply a villain who makes a

bad choice and suffers the consequences. He is a flawed human being, who realizes too late

that his desire for power and knowledge has cost him his soul.

Conclusion

In conclusion, I agree with the statement that Marlowe brilliantly combines the traits of

corruption, ambition, power, and regretfulness in the figure of Faustus. These qualities are

intertwined in a way that makes Faustus a tragic and memorable character. His ambition

leads him to corruption, his desire for power traps him in servitude to the devil, and his

regret comes too late to save him. Through the character of Faustus, Marlowe explores the

human condition and the moral dilemmas that arise from the pursuit of power and

knowledge.

Faustus’ journey is a cautionary tale about the consequences of unchecked ambition and

the dangers of making choices that cannot be undone. Marlowe's portrayal of Faustus

serves as a timeless reminder of the importance of balance between human desire and

moral responsibility.

This play, though written centuries ago, remains relevant today, as it raises questions about

the lengths people are willing to go in their pursuit of success and power. In this way,

"Doctor Faustus" continues to resonate with modern audiences and serves as a powerful

exploration of the human psyche.

4. Elaborate the sequence of the events in the plot that make Faustus encounter

Mephistopheles and other figures in the play.

Ans: 1. Introduction to Doctor Faustus' Character

The play opens with the audience being introduced to Doctor Faustus, a highly educated

scholar from Wittenberg, Germany. Faustus is unsatisfied with the limits of traditional forms

of knowledge, such as logic, medicine, law, and theology. He wants more power and control,

Easy2Siksha

and this desire leads him to turn to necromancy, the magical practice of communicating

with demons.

Faustus begins by studying books on magic and summoning demons. His desire to gain

unlimited power and knowledge through magical means is a critical turning point, and it sets

the stage for his eventual encounter with Mephistopheles.

2. Faustus' Temptation and Inner Conflict

At this early stage, Faustus is already conflicted. While he desires the power that magic can

offer, he also feels the weight of the moral consequences that come with dealing with dark

forces. This is represented by the appearance of two symbolic figures—the Good Angel and

the Bad Angel. The Good Angel tries to warn Faustus against the dangers of practicing magic

and encourages him to turn to God. On the other hand, the Bad Angel tempts Faustus,

telling him to pursue necromancy because it will make him more powerful than any other

man.

Faustus decides to ignore the Good Angel’s advice and chooses to proceed with his plans to

summon a demon.

3. Faustus Summons Mephistopheles

Using his knowledge of magic, Faustus performs an incantation to summon Mephistopheles,

a demon. Mephistopheles arrives, appearing as an agent of Lucifer, the prince of devils.

However, Faustus is not initially afraid. He is excited and asks Mephistopheles to serve him.

Faustus is under the impression that his magical abilities have given him control over the

demon.

But Mephistopheles quickly corrects Faustus, explaining that demons do not act under the

command of human beings. Mephistopheles came because Faustus rejected God and has

already begun to align himself with Lucifer. Mephistopheles reveals that his presence is a

direct result of Faustus' decision to turn away from heaven.

4. Faustus' Pact with Lucifer

Faustus is determined to gain more power, so he makes a dangerous request: he asks

Mephistopheles to serve him for 24 years, providing him with all the knowledge and power

he desires. In return, Faustus agrees to sell his soul to Lucifer. This act—known as making a

“Faustian bargain”—becomes the central conflict of the play. Faustus believes that the

temporary power he will gain in this world is worth the eternal suffering he will endure in

hell after his death.

Mephistopheles leaves to bring the offer to Lucifer, while Faustus, in a state of excitement,

prepares for his new life. At this point, Faustus still believes that he is in control of his fate

and that his decision is justified.

5. The Signing of the Contract

Lucifer agrees to Faustus' proposal, but to finalize the deal, Faustus must sign a contract in

his own blood. When Faustus tries to cut his arm to draw blood, his blood congeals,

Easy2Siksha

preventing him from writing. This is a supernatural warning for Faustus, but he ignores it.

Eventually, he forces his blood to flow and signs the contract, officially sealing his fate.

Immediately after, there are signs that Faustus’ decision may not have been wise. For

instance, the words "Homo fuge!" (Latin for "Man, fly!") appear on his arm, urging him to

escape from this fate while he still can. However, Faustus dismisses these warnings.

6. Faustus Begins to Use His Powers

With the contract signed, Mephistopheles now serves Faustus and gives him the powers he

sought. Faustus is granted magical abilities that allow him to travel the world, summon

spirits, and perform supernatural feats. Despite this newfound power, Faustus often uses his

abilities for trivial purposes. Instead of engaging in serious scholarly pursuits, he plays

pranks on people and entertains himself with petty displays of magic.

This phase of the play reflects Faustus’ inner emptiness. Although he now possesses magical

powers, he finds little satisfaction in them. Faustus is not as fulfilled as he expected to be,

and this dissatisfaction begins to weigh on him.

7. Faustus' Encounters with Various Figures

As the years pass, Faustus uses his powers to impress and interact with various figures.

Some of the key encounters include:

• The Pope: Faustus visits Rome and, with Mephistopheles, plays pranks on Pope

Adrian during a banquet. He becomes invisible and disrupts the event, mocking the

Pope and the Catholic Church. This scene is a reflection of Marlowe’s critical view of

religious institutions.

• The Emperor of Germany: Faustus impresses the German Emperor, Charles V, by

summoning the spirits of Alexander the Great and his paramour. Although the

Emperor is entertained, this encounter once again highlights how Faustus uses his

powers for showmanship rather than meaningful purposes.

• A Knight (Benvolio): A skeptical knight named Benvolio mocks Faustus, which

prompts Faustus to humiliate him by making horns grow on his head. This encounter

reflects Faustus’ increasing pettiness as he lashes out at anyone who doubts his

powers.

8. Faustus' Growing Despair

As the 24 years begin to draw to a close, Faustus becomes increasingly aware of the

consequences of his actions. The once-confident scholar is now filled with regret and fear.

He has moments where he considers repenting, but he is continually persuaded not to by

Mephistopheles and the Bad Angel.

At one point, Faustus even contemplates returning to God and seeking forgiveness, but

Lucifer and other demons appear, showing him visions of hell and reminding him of the pact

he made. Faustus is trapped by his own decision, unable to seek redemption.

Easy2Siksha

9. The Final Hours of Faustus' Life

As the end of the 24 years approaches, Faustus becomes terrified of his impending

damnation. He expresses deep regret for his choices and wishes he could undo the contract.

However, it is too late. Faustus spends his final hours in agony, begging for more time and

hoping for divine intervention.

In the final moments, as midnight strikes, a group of devils, led by Mephistopheles, comes

to collect Faustus' soul. He is dragged away to hell, screaming in terror. The play concludes

with a chorus that reflects on Faustus' tragic fall, warning others not to follow his path.

Conclusion

The sequence of events in Doctor Faustus follows Faustus’ journey from a respected scholar

to a tragic figure who loses his soul in the pursuit of power. His encounter with

Mephistopheles and the other figures in the play serves as a cautionary tale about the

dangers of ambition and the consequences of turning away from moral and spiritual values.

Faustus’ story is a representation of the Renaissance humanist pursuit of knowledge and the

consequences of overreaching. His ultimate downfall comes from his refusal to heed the

warnings of divine mercy and his persistent belief that he can outwit fate.

Throughout the play, Faustus’ encounters with Mephistopheles, Lucifer, the Pope, and the

Emperor highlight his descent from a man of potential to a man consumed by his own

hubris. His inability to find true fulfillment in his magical powers and his refusal to repent

contribute to his tragic end. Marlowe’s play, therefore, explores themes of sin, redemption,

and the human condition, making it a timeless work of Renaissance drama.

SECTION-C

5. What is your view of Hamlet's soliloquies: are they personal mediations,

or these have a wider significance ?

Ans: Hamlet’s soliloquies are one of the most profound aspects of Shakespeare's play Hamlet.

These soliloquies serve as windows into Hamlet’s inner thoughts and emotions, providing insight

into his personal struggles. However, they also hold a broader significance that touches on universal

human themes, such as life, death, indecision, and morality. In analyzing these soliloquies, one can

see that they function both as deeply personal reflections for Hamlet and as expressions of

philosophical questions that resonate with a wider audience.

Personal Meditations of Hamlet

On the surface, Hamlet’s soliloquies seem to be his way of processing his personal emotions

and dilemmas. They reveal his complex personality and deep psychological turmoil. For

Hamlet, these soliloquies are moments of introspection where he contemplates his feelings

Easy2Siksha

of grief, betrayal, indecision, and the moral conflicts that arise from the circumstances he

finds himself in.

Hamlet's Grief and Mourning

From the very beginning of the play, Hamlet is grieving the death of his father, King Hamlet,

and is struggling with his mother Gertrude’s quick remarriage to his uncle Claudius, the new

king. In his first soliloquy in Act 1, Scene 2 (“O that this too too solid flesh would melt”),

Hamlet expresses his profound sorrow and disgust at the state of his life. He feels trapped in

a world filled with corruption and feels utterly alone in his grief. This soliloquy is highly

personal because Hamlet is not speaking to anyone else; he is essentially talking to himself,

revealing the raw emotions he is trying to keep hidden from others. Here, we see Hamlet’s

wish for an escape from his emotional pain, even expressing a desire for death. His personal

mourning is laid bare as he contemplates the futility of life.

Hamlet’s Inner Conflict and Indecision

A recurring theme in Hamlet’s soliloquies is his struggle with decision-making. Throughout

the play, Hamlet wrestles with how he should act in response to the murder of his father. In

his most famous soliloquy, “To be, or not to be” (Act 3, Scene 1), Hamlet reflects on the

nature of existence and whether it is better to endure the hardships of life or to end them

by embracing death. This soliloquy is an intimate exploration of Hamlet’s mind as he

contemplates suicide and the fear of what comes after death. For Hamlet, this is a deeply

personal meditation on life’s suffering and the uncertainty of the afterlife.

In Act 2, Scene 2, Hamlet's soliloquy (“O, what a rogue and peasant slave am I”) reveals his

frustration with his own inaction. He criticizes himself for not yet having avenged his

father’s murder, despite having the perfect motive. This soliloquy is another reflection of

Hamlet’s internal conflict—he knows what he needs to do, but he cannot bring himself to

act. His self-loathing and confusion highlight his inability to reconcile his emotions with his

sense of duty.

Hamlet’s Moral and Ethical Dilemmas

Another aspect of Hamlet’s soliloquies that makes them highly personal is the moral

dilemmas he faces. Hamlet is torn between his desire for revenge and his moral and ethical

beliefs. He questions the morality of revenge, as seen in the soliloquy in Act 3, Scene 3

(“Now might I do it pat, now he is praying”). Here, Hamlet contemplates killing Claudius

while he is praying, but he hesitates because he believes that if Claudius is killed during

prayer, his soul will go to heaven. Hamlet’s internal debate shows that he is not merely

driven by anger but also by a sense of right and wrong. This soliloquy reflects Hamlet’s deep

concern with justice and the consequences of his actions, making his meditations intensely

personal.

Broader Significance of Hamlet’s Soliloquies

While Hamlet’s soliloquies are deeply personal reflections, they also carry a wider

significance. The themes explored in these soliloquies—life, death, morality, and

Easy2Siksha

indecision—are universal and resonate with audiences across time and culture. Shakespeare

uses Hamlet’s internal monologues to express ideas and emotions that are not just specific

to the character but also represent fundamental human concerns.

Universal Themes of Life and Death

Hamlet’s soliloquies tackle the profound questions of life and death, which are central to

human existence. The “To be, or not to be” soliloquy is perhaps the most significant

example of this. In this speech, Hamlet contemplates whether it is better to endure the

suffering of life or to end it through suicide. This reflection on the nature of existence

touches on universal human fears, such as the fear of the unknown after death and the pain

of living. Hamlet’s personal contemplation of suicide becomes a broader exploration of life’s

difficulties and the human tendency to endure suffering in the face of uncertainty.

This soliloquy, though born from Hamlet’s personal anguish, has resonated with audiences

for centuries because it speaks to a fundamental aspect of the human condition—the desire

to understand life’s purpose and the fear of death. Shakespeare, through Hamlet, raises

questions that people of all times and cultures have grappled with: What does it mean to

live? What happens after death? These are not just Hamlet’s personal questions, but

universal ones that have a wider philosophical significance.

The Struggle with Indecision

Hamlet’s inability to make decisions is not just a personal flaw; it reflects a broader human

struggle with taking action in the face of uncertainty. Hamlet’s hesitation to avenge his

father’s death is a recurring theme throughout the play, and in his soliloquies, we see the

psychological and emotional toll that indecision takes on him. However, Hamlet’s indecision

also speaks to a more general human experience—the difficulty of making choices,

especially when the consequences are unclear or morally ambiguous.

Many people, like Hamlet, find themselves paralyzed by indecision, caught between

conflicting desires or responsibilities. Hamlet’s soliloquies, therefore, resonate with anyone

who has experienced the frustration of not knowing the right course of action. His personal

reflections on action and inaction become a broader commentary on human nature’s

struggle with decision-making and the fear of making the wrong choice.

The Nature of Revenge and Justice

Another theme that has wider significance in Hamlet’s soliloquies is the nature of revenge

and justice. Hamlet’s quest to avenge his father’s murder is at the heart of the play, but it is

also a philosophical exploration of the morality of revenge. In his soliloquies, Hamlet

grapples with the idea of revenge as a form of justice and whether it is morally justifiable.

His hesitation to kill Claudius while he is praying in Act 3, Scene 3 reflects Hamlet’s deep

concern with the ethics of revenge.

This theme of justice and revenge goes beyond Hamlet’s personal dilemma and speaks to a

broader societal concern with the balance between personal vengeance and the rule of law.

Easy2Siksha

Shakespeare uses Hamlet’s personal struggle to explore the ethical implications of revenge,

a theme that continues to be relevant in discussions of justice and morality today.

Hamlet as a Representation of the Human Condition

In a broader sense, Hamlet’s soliloquies offer a representation of the human condition.

Hamlet’s reflections on life, death, indecision, and morality are not unique to him; they are

reflections of the universal human experience. Through Hamlet, Shakespeare explores the

complexities of the human mind and the existential questions that arise from living in a

world filled with uncertainty and suffering.

The themes of Hamlet’s soliloquies—grief, revenge, indecision, morality, and the search for

meaning—are all aspects of the human condition that continue to resonate with people

today. Hamlet’s personal meditations, therefore, take on a wider significance because they

reflect the shared experiences and struggles of humanity. Shakespeare’s genius lies in his

ability to take Hamlet’s individual thoughts and emotions and make them speak to universal

truths.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Hamlet’s soliloquies are both deeply personal meditations and expressions of

broader philosophical questions. On a personal level, they reveal Hamlet’s inner emotional

turmoil, his grief, indecision, and moral struggles. However, these soliloquies also have a

wider significance, as they touch on universal themes of life, death, morality, and the human

condition. Shakespeare uses Hamlet’s soliloquies not only to develop his character but also

to explore fundamental questions that continue to resonate with audiences across time and

culture. The combination of personal introspection and universal relevance is what makes

Hamlet’s soliloquies some of the most profound and enduring aspects of the play.

6. Elaborate the different critical opinions about Hamlet's procrastination,

and its 'mystery.'

Ans: Hamlet’s procrastination, or delay in avenging his father's murder, is one of the central

mysteries of Shakespeare’s Hamlet. Over the years, critics have debated and proposed various

reasons for this hesitation, offering different interpretations that reflect Hamlet's complex

psychological and philosophical struggles. Below is an exploration of these critical opinions,

simplified for easier understanding.

1. The Oedipal Complex Theory

Sigmund Freud proposed one of the most famous psychological readings of Hamlet’s

procrastination, interpreting it through the lens of the Oedipal complex. According to this

Easy2Siksha

theory, Hamlet’s delay stems from unconscious guilt because he harbors repressed sexual

desires for his mother, Gertrude, and sees in Claudius the fulfillment of his own secret

wishes. Claudius has acted out what Hamlet subconsciously wanted to do—kill his father

and marry his mother. This internal conflict paralyzes Hamlet, preventing him from swiftly

avenging his father’s death

2. The Overthinking and Philosophical Approach

Many critics attribute Hamlet’s procrastination to his deep philosophical nature and his

tendency to overthink. Hamlet is not a straightforward man of action like Fortinbras or

Laertes. Instead, he reflects intensely on the nature of life, death, and the moral

implications of revenge. In the famous "To be or not to be" soliloquy, Hamlet reveals his

contemplation of suicide and his fears about the afterlife. His indecision arises because he is

constantly torn between his moral duty and his dread of what lies beyond death(

Shakespeare portrays Hamlet as a man grappling with existential questions, which causes

him to lose resolve. His paralysis by analysis, where he weighs every possible outcome,

contributes to his inaction. This philosophical dilemma is reflected in Hamlet’s debates

about the righteousness of his revenge. Hamlet’s overthinking leads to hesitation, as he

becomes trapped in a web of doubts and uncertainties

3. The Tragic Flaw Theory

According to the classical Aristotelian concept of tragedy, Hamlet’s procrastination can be

seen as his tragic flaw (also called hamartia). In many traditional tragedies, the hero

possesses a flaw that leads to their downfall. For Hamlet, this flaw is often interpreted as his

indecision or excessive contemplation. His inability to act swiftly, despite numerous

opportunities, leads to the tragic outcomes of the play. Critics argue that Hamlet's flaw is

not merely a personal shortcoming but a reflection of the human condition: our propensity

to delay, hesitate, and rationalize

4. The Revenge vs. Conscience Conflict

Hamlet’s inner conflict between revenge and conscience is another key factor in his delay.

While Hamlet feels compelled to avenge his father's murder, he is deeply troubled by the

idea of killing, particularly when it involves Claudius, who seems to repent at prayer.

Hamlet's moral qualms, and his desire to ensure that Claudius is condemned to eternal

damnation rather than achieving redemption, lead to further delays. At times, Hamlet even

questions whether it is morally right to take revenge at all, a dilemma that resonates

throughout the play

In this sense, Hamlet’s delay is not simply about his lack of courage but about his struggle to

reconcile his moral conscience with the duty of revenge. His famous hesitation during

Claudius’s prayer scene illustrates this moral dilemma, where Hamlet rationalizes not killing

Claudius at that moment, fearing it would send him to heaven

Easy2Siksha

5. Psychological Trauma and Identity Crisis

Some modern interpretations focus on Hamlet’s psychological state, suggesting that he

suffers from trauma, depression, and an identity crisis. The sudden death of his father, the

hasty remarriage of his mother, and the revelation of his uncle's treachery leave Hamlet

emotionally paralyzed. His prolonged grief and emotional turmoil may cause him to delay

action, as he struggles to find purpose in a world that seems corrupt and meaningless(

In this reading, Hamlet’s procrastination is not just a result of overthinking or moral conflict

but also a symptom of his deep psychological distress. He is caught in an existential crisis,

unsure of his role in life, and unable to summon the strength to act decisively.

6. The Plot Device Argument

Some critics argue that Hamlet’s procrastination serves a practical purpose within the

structure of the play itself. If Hamlet were to kill Claudius immediately, the play would be

over much too quickly. By delaying Hamlet's revenge, Shakespeare creates dramatic tension

and explores deeper themes, such as the complexities of human nature, the consequences

of inaction, and the philosophical questions surrounding death and morality. From this

perspective, Hamlet's procrastination is a deliberate narrative device used to sustain the

play’s drama

7. Religious and Supernatural Doubts

Another interpretation considers Hamlet’s doubts about the Ghost's authenticity. In the

early stages of the play, Hamlet is unsure whether the Ghost is truly his father or a demon

sent to trick him into committing a sin. This uncertainty causes Hamlet to hesitate, as he

needs more evidence of Claudius's guilt before taking action. The staging of "The

Mousetrap" play, where Claudius reacts to a reenactment of the murder, is Hamlet’s

attempt to resolve these doubts and confirm that the Ghost is telling the truth(

This supernatural uncertainty contributes significantly to Hamlet's delay, as he feels

compelled to verify the legitimacy of his father’s spirit before committing regicide, which

would be considered a grave sin.

8. Hamlet’s Acceptance of Fate

In the later stages of the play, Hamlet begins to embrace a more fatalistic view of life. After

his return from England, where he narrowly escapes death, Hamlet seems to have come to

terms with the inevitability of fate. He acknowledges that certain things are beyond his

control, and he resigns himself to the idea that "the readiness is all." This shift in Hamlet’s

mindset suggests that his earlier procrastination was due to his resistance to accepting the

uncertainty of life and death. Once he accepts fate, he is finally able to act, leading to the

play’s tragic conclusion

Conclusion

The mystery of Hamlet’s procrastination has fascinated critics for centuries. Different

interpretations have emerged, ranging from psychological and philosophical explanations to

Easy2Siksha

structural and plot-related arguments. Whether due to Hamlet’s overthinking, moral

dilemmas, psychological trauma, or the need for dramatic tension, his delay in avenging his

father’s murder is central to the play’s exploration of human nature and the complexities of

action and inaction.

Ultimately, Hamlet’s procrastination reflects the intricate web of human emotions and the

struggle between thought and action, making it one of the most enduring and debated

elements in all of Shakespearean drama.

SECTION-D

7. Discuss the action of volpone in the following context:

'its theme is folly, its characteristics method is irony; and its conclusion

is the relevation of folly and cleverness as self defeating.'

Ans: Analysis of "Volpone" in the Context of Folly, Irony, and Self-Defeating Cleverness

Ben Jonson's Volpone is a complex satirical play that critiques human greed, deception, and

the corrupting influence of wealth through a central figure, Volpone, whose cleverness

ultimately becomes self-defeating. Let’s break down its major themes and approach.

Theme of Folly

At its core, Volpone deals with human folly, especially the folly of greed and the lengths

people go to in pursuit of wealth. The characters in the play, particularly Volpone’s victims

(Voltore, Corbaccio, Corvino), are foolish enough to believe they can outwit one another to

inherit Volpone’s fortune, but their own greed blinds them to the obvious deceptions. The

title character, Volpone himself, exemplifies the ultimate folly. His obsession with trickery

and manipulation to accumulate wealth and power reflects a flawed mindset that believes

such behavior can be sustained without consequence.

Volpone's victims—Corbaccio, Corvino, and Voltore—are equally drawn into the trap of

folly. Their foolishness lies in believing they are smarter than each other, driven by their

own greed to secure Volpone’s fortune. Despite witnessing clear evidence of their trickery,

none of the characters learns any lesson until their eventual downfall. The theme of folly

here is not only about personal greed but also about societal structures that allow this folly

to flourish. The victims’ willingness to engage in deceit stems from their belief that material

wealth equates to happiness and power. This greed-driven folly pushes them into deeper

moral corruption, highlighting the absurdity of their ambitions.

Easy2Siksha

Use of Irony

Jonson masterfully employs irony as the central method in the play. In Volpone, irony

functions on two levels: situational and verbal. The greatest irony is how each character's

efforts to outwit the others eventually become the source of their downfall. Volpone, whose

clever manipulation allows him to trick his victims for amusement, is ultimately trapped by

his own arrogance. His final attempt to deceive by faking his death and naming Mosca as his

heir backfires, as Mosca betrays him to secure the fortune for himself. Volpone, who sought

complete control, is ironically defeated by his most trusted ally, revealing that cleverness,

when taken to extremes, can undo itself.

Similarly, the ironic fates of the other characters amplify the theme. Corbaccio disinherits

his son Bonario to please Volpone but ends up humiliated and exiled. Corvino tries to

prostitute his wife Celia to Volpone, only to lose both his wife and his wealth. Voltore, the

lawyer, manipulates the legal system for personal gain, only to be disbarred and disgraced.

Jonson's irony emphasizes that their greed blinds them to the obvious truth: that in their

pursuit of wealth, they are the real fools. Their schemes are transparent and self-defeating,

making them more laughable than pitiable.

Self-Defeating Cleverness

The conclusion of Volpone is a direct illustration of how cleverness, without ethical

grounding, leads to self-destruction. Throughout the play, Volpone revels in his cleverness,

deriving pleasure not just from gaining wealth but from the act of deceiving others.

However, his pride and arrogance prevent him from recognizing the inherent flaws in his

schemes. When he pretends to be dead, leaving his fortune to Mosca for amusement, he

does not anticipate that Mosca, too, is driven by self-interest. Mosca’s betrayal turns

Volpone’s ultimate deception against him, leading to his downfall. Thus, Volpone’s

cleverness, which initially seems to give him power over others, becomes the very thing that

undoes him.

The characters' failures reflect the broader moral lesson of the play: unchecked cleverness

and greed are inherently self-destructive. Jonson contrasts their self-serving cleverness with

the more virtuous, albeit victimized, characters like Bonario and Celia. However, even the

eventual revelation of the truth in court is driven not by justice or virtue, but by the collapse

of the villains' schemes. In a bitterly ironic twist, it is not moral virtue that defeats Volpone,

but his inability to control his clever manipulations. The punishments at the end of the play

serve as a warning that cleverness used for malicious purposes will always collapse under its

own weight.

The Structure and the Justice

The ending of Volpone also reveals the play's satirical tone. The harsh punishments meted

out to the characters—Mosca’s life as a galley slave, Volpone’s imprisonment—highlight the

rigid, yet ironic, justice system in Venice. However, Jonson leaves the audience with a sense

of discomfort, as the justice seems more a result of the characters’ failed schemes rather

Easy2Siksha

than any moral retribution. The play’s conclusion suggests that cleverness without moral

consideration is not only foolish but also doomed to fail.

Thus, Volpone presents a cautionary tale about the dangers of greed, manipulation, and

cleverness without integrity. The theme of folly runs throughout, embodied in both Volpone

and his victims, while irony underscores their self-deceptions and eventual downfalls.

Ultimately, Jonson’s use of irony and cleverness reveals how both greed and intellectual

superiority are flawed, leading the characters to their own undoing

8. 'In Volpone there are temptations, corruptions and greed for luxuries, on the other,

Jonson as a classicis. of his age, imposes order, tradition and morality in conduct.

Elaborate.

Ans: Volpone, written by Ben Jonson in 1606, is one of the most famous plays of the English

Renaissance. It is a satirical comedy that explores themes of greed, corruption, deception, and moral

decay, with an emphasis on the pursuit of wealth and luxury. The play presents a picture of a world

where individuals are driven by greed and desire for material gain, but at the same time, Jonson, as a

classicist, upholds the values of order, tradition, and morality.

In this answer, we will explore these two aspects in detail: on one hand, the temptations,

corruption, and greed for luxuries that drive the characters of Volpone, and on the other

hand, how Jonson’s classical values influence the play, enforcing a sense of order and

morality.

1. The World of Temptations, Corruptions, and Greed

Volpone is set in Venice, a city often symbolized in literature as a place of corruption and

moral decay. Venice’s association with trade and wealth makes it an ideal setting for a story

driven by the greed for material luxuries. The characters in the play, particularly Volpone

and his associates, are driven by this greed, which leads them into morally questionable

actions.

Volpone’s Greed and Deception

Volpone, the main character, is a rich man who deceives others into believing that he is

dying, in order to trick them into giving him gifts. He pretends to be on his deathbed,

encouraging wealthy men to visit him and offer expensive bribes in hopes that he will make

them his heir. This deception shows how deeply greed has corrupted him. Volpone is not

content with the wealth he already has—his greed for more drives him to manipulate and

exploit the people around him.

Easy2Siksha

Volpone’s greed also manifests in his lust for luxury and indulgence. He relishes in the

material pleasures his wealth brings, and his deception is motivated not just by a desire to

accumulate more wealth, but also to maintain his extravagant lifestyle.

Corruption of Other Characters

Volpone is not the only character driven by greed. Several other characters in the play are

similarly corrupted by their desire for wealth. These include Voltore, a lawyer; Corbaccio, an

old miser; and Corvino, a merchant. Each of these characters is willing to sacrifice their

morals in the hope of inheriting Volpone’s fortune.

• Voltore uses his legal expertise to manipulate situations for his own benefit.

• Corbaccio is so blinded by greed that he disinherits his own son in the hope of

gaining Volpone’s wealth.

• Corvino goes to the extreme of offering his wife to Volpone, showing the depths of

his moral corruption.

All of these characters are drawn into Volpone’s web of deception because of their greed,

and each of them acts in ways that are ethically wrong, emphasizing how deeply corrupting

the desire for wealth can be.

The Temptation of Materialism

The world of Volpone is one where material wealth and luxury are highly prized, and this

creates a society driven by temptation. Jonson shows how people can be tempted into

immoral actions when wealth and luxury become their primary goals. For instance, Corvino,

who initially loves and respects his wife, is tempted by the possibility of inheriting Volpone’s

fortune and ultimately decides to offer her to Volpone. This illustrates how the pursuit of

wealth can erode personal relationships and moral values.

In Volpone, Jonson critiques the way that society values material wealth over human

relationships and ethical conduct. The characters in the play are so consumed by their desire

for wealth that they lose sight of what is morally right.

2. Jonson’s Classical Influences: Order, Tradition, and Morality

Although Volpone presents a world filled with corruption, greed, and moral decay, Jonson,

as a classicist, ensures that the play is structured in a way that ultimately upholds order and

morality. Jonson was influenced by classical Roman and Greek literature, particularly the

comedies of playwrights like Plautus and Terence, which often followed a strict structure

where moral lessons were imparted, and order was restored at the end of the play.

Morality and Punishment

In line with classical traditions, Volpone concludes with the punishment of the wrongdoers.

Throughout the play, Volpone and his associates engage in immoral behavior, but by the

end, justice is served. Volpone, who has deceived everyone and engaged in dishonest acts,

is eventually exposed and punished. He is sentenced to imprisonment, and his wealth is

Easy2Siksha

confiscated. His accomplice, Mosca, who also manipulates and exploits others, is similarly

punished.

By ensuring that the characters who engage in immoral actions are punished, Jonson

reinforces the idea that order and justice must prevail. The punishment of Volpone and

Mosca serves as a moral lesson, reminding the audience that greed and deception

ultimately lead to downfall.

The Role of Tradition and Classical Values

As a classicist, Jonson believed in the importance of maintaining social order and following

traditional moral values. In Volpone, Jonson critiques the breakdown of these values in a

society consumed by materialism. The characters who are driven by greed and desire for

luxury are shown to be corrupt and morally deficient, while those who uphold traditional

values, such as Bonario and Celia, are portrayed as virtuous.

• Bonario, the son of Corbaccio, refuses to be tempted by the possibility of inheriting

Volpone’s wealth and remains steadfast in his commitment to doing what is right.

• Celia, Corvino’s wife, is virtuous and rejects the immoral advances of Volpone, even

when her husband pressures her to comply.

These characters represent the traditional values of honesty, loyalty, and virtue that Jonson

seeks to uphold in the play. Through their actions, Jonson reinforces the idea that moral

integrity is more important than material wealth.

The Influence of Classical Comedy

Jonson’s structure in Volpone is heavily influenced by classical comedy. In classical comedy,

the plot often involves a series of misunderstandings, deceptions, and conflicts, but by the

end of the play, these are resolved, and order is restored. Similarly, in Volpone, the chaos

created by Volpone’s deception is resolved by the end, and justice is served.

Classical comedies often included a moral lesson, and Volpone follows this tradition. The

play serves as a critique of the corrupting influence of wealth and materialism, and it

imparts a clear moral lesson about the dangers of greed. By adhering to the structure and

values of classical comedy, Jonson ensures that the play remains grounded in order and

morality, despite the chaos that unfolds.

3. The Balance Between Chaos and Order

One of the key strengths of Volpone is the balance Jonson strikes between the chaotic world

of greed and corruption and the ultimate restoration of order. Throughout the play, the

characters are consumed by their desires for wealth, and this leads to a world filled with

deception, immorality, and chaos. However, Jonson ensures that this chaos is not the final

state of the world. By the end of the play, order is restored, and justice is served.

This balance reflects Jonson’s belief in the importance of maintaining social order and

upholding moral values. While Volpone explores the darker aspects of human nature,

Jonson ultimately emphasizes the need for tradition, morality, and justice in society.

Easy2Siksha

Conclusion

In Volpone, Ben Jonson presents a world filled with temptations, corruption, and greed,

driven by the desire for material luxuries. The characters in the play are consumed by their

pursuit of wealth, leading them to engage in morally questionable actions. However, as a

classicist, Jonson also upholds the values of order, tradition, and morality. By the end of the

play, justice is served, and the wrongdoers are punished, reinforcing the idea that greed and

deception ultimately lead to downfall.

Jonson’s classical influences are evident in the structure of the play, which follows the

traditions of classical comedy, where chaos is resolved, and order is restored. Through

Volpone, Jonson critiques the corrupting influence of wealth and materialism while also

imparting a moral lesson about the importance of integrity, honesty, and traditional values

Note: This Answer Paper is totally Solved by Ai (Artificial Intelligence) So if You find Any Error Or Mistake . Give us a

Feedback related Error , We will Definitely Try To solve this Problem Or Error.